|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
BernieD says, "In this case, there's no specified constraint on the
design other than the laws of physics."
|
 |
HarrisD asks, "Describing the project in the superlative is like a
constraint, no?"
|
 |
RoddL says, "The time constraint would seem to set me back... no time to
focus on construction of a mo.del which would be a realistic
necessity"
|
 |
VennyS [:)] nods to Judi.
BJB [HelpDesk] shows VennyS the URL:
http://www.esc2.net/TIELevel2/projects/roller/
BernieD says, "We could, however, have said that it can be no higher
than 100 feet and that the riders must achieve an
acceleration of (some figure)."
|
 |
BernieD says, "A fuzzy constraint, Harris."
|
 |
VennyS [:)] bows to the early bird
|
 |
BernieD says, "Let's look at another Physical Thing design."
|
 |
HarrisD says, "Yes fuzzy...The rollercoaster applet would entertain me
for a long while"
|
 |
BernieD projects the URL:
|
 |
http://www.msu.edu/%7Ewetherb1/robots.html
BernieD asks, "What do we think of this one?"
|
 |
PhilipAB [WebTeach] is miffed because he can't view the power point in
"process"...
|
 |
BernieD says, "Sympathetic miffing from here, too."
|
 |
HarrisD asks, "Is producing a machine for artic conditions enough of a
constraint?"
|
 |
PhilipAB says, "As it stands, there is nowhere near enough guidance. The
teacher must present a lot of elements that never made it
to the activity page."
|
 |
BernieD says, "Sure is, but it is it sufficiently described here? Could
|